New LOV Group vs LOV in existing LOV Group

Would like to understand when it’s appropriate to create a LOV Group and when it’s best to create individual LOVs within existing group in the LOV Management module.

Could you explain the situations or criteria that determine when I should create a LOV Group and when I should create LOV within existing group?

1 Like

Creating a List of Values (LOV) Group as the first step followed by creating LOVs within the group is a logical hierarchy, and the decision of when to create a new LOV Group versus when to create an LOV in an existing LOV Group should be based on several factors. Here’s how you can frame the answer with a focus on this hierarchy:

1. Similarity of LOVs:

  • LOV Group: Always start by creating an LOV Group when you have a set of LOVs that share a common theme, characteristic, or purpose. LOV Groups are like containers that help you categorize and organize related LOVs together. For example, consider creating a “Demographic” LOV Group to encompass related LOVs such as Gender, Title, and Nominee Type. This approach keeps things organized and ensures that LOVs with similar attributes are grouped together.
  • LOV in Existing Group: Create an LOV within an existing group when it aligns with the theme or purpose of that group. If the LOV you need to add shares common characteristics with an existing LOV Group, it’s more efficient to add it to the relevant group rather than creating a new one.

2. Reusability:

  • LOV Group: LOV Groups should be created with reusability in mind. If you anticipate using the same set of LOVs in multiple parts of your application, create an LOV Group to house them. This enables you to reference the entire group wherever needed and prevents redundancy.
  • LOV in Existing Group: If a particular LOV is only needed in one place and isn’t expected to be reused elsewhere, consider adding it to an existing group that aligns with its purpose. This way, you can maintain a clear structure without unnecessary group creation.

3. Scalability:

  • LOV Group: When planning for future scalability, LOV Groups are a wise choice. They allow for the easy addition of more LOVs of the same category in the future, making your LOV management more flexible and accommodating potential growth.
  • LOV in Existing Group: If a specific LOV doesn’t fit the context of any LOV Group, it’s better to insert it into a related group where it fits rather than creating a new group for just one LOV.

4. Maintenance and Accessibility:

  • LOV Group: LOV Groups are beneficial when multiple team members are collaborating on different aspects of the application. They provide a structured way to access and maintain related LOVs, streamlining the development process.
  • LOV in Existing Group: Individual LOVs within existing groups are preferable when you have a smaller application or when the LOVs can be efficiently managed without the need for extensive grouping.

In summary, the hierarchy typically starts with creating an LOV Group when you have a set of related LOVs and then adding individual LOVs to existing groups when they align with the theme or purpose of those groups. This approach ensures an organized and efficient LOV management system, with LOV Groups serving as containers for related LOVs and individual LOVs residing within appropriate groups for effective categorization.

1 Like